Commit 72ac62ba authored by Daeho Jeong's avatar Daeho Jeong Committed by Jiri Slaby

ext4: fix inode checksum calculation problem if i_extra_size is small

commit 05ac5aa1 upstream.

We've fixed the race condition problem in calculating ext4 checksum
value in commit b47820ed ("ext4: avoid modifying checksum fields
directly during checksum veficationon"). However, by this change,
when calculating the checksum value of inode whose i_extra_size is
less than 4, we couldn't calculate the checksum value in a proper way.
This problem was found and reported by Nix, Thank you.
Reported-by: default avatarNix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarYoungjin Gil <youngjin.gil@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
parent 03662cd0
......@@ -73,10 +73,9 @@ static __u32 ext4_inode_csum(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_inode *raw,
csum = ext4_chksum(sbi, csum, (__u8 *)&dummy_csum,
csum_size);
offset += csum_size;
csum = ext4_chksum(sbi, csum, (__u8 *)raw + offset,
EXT4_INODE_SIZE(inode->i_sb) -
offset);
}
csum = ext4_chksum(sbi, csum, (__u8 *)raw + offset,
EXT4_INODE_SIZE(inode->i_sb) - offset);
}
return csum;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment