Commit 72b43570 authored by Namhyung Kim's avatar Namhyung Kim Committed by Jiri Kosina

ext2: fix a typo on comment in ext2/inode.c

'excpet' should be 'except'.
'ext3_get_branch' should be 'ext2_get_branch'.
Signed-off-by: default avatarNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
parent 35df8397
...@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static int ext2_alloc_blocks(struct inode *inode, ...@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static int ext2_alloc_blocks(struct inode *inode,
* the same format as ext2_get_branch() would do. We are calling it after * the same format as ext2_get_branch() would do. We are calling it after
* we had read the existing part of chain and partial points to the last * we had read the existing part of chain and partial points to the last
* triple of that (one with zero ->key). Upon the exit we have the same * triple of that (one with zero ->key). Upon the exit we have the same
* picture as after the successful ext2_get_block(), excpet that in one * picture as after the successful ext2_get_block(), except that in one
* place chain is disconnected - *branch->p is still zero (we did not * place chain is disconnected - *branch->p is still zero (we did not
* set the last link), but branch->key contains the number that should * set the last link), but branch->key contains the number that should
* be placed into *branch->p to fill that gap. * be placed into *branch->p to fill that gap.
...@@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static int ext2_get_blocks(struct inode *inode, ...@@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static int ext2_get_blocks(struct inode *inode,
mutex_lock(&ei->truncate_mutex); mutex_lock(&ei->truncate_mutex);
/* /*
* If the indirect block is missing while we are reading * If the indirect block is missing while we are reading
* the chain(ext3_get_branch() returns -EAGAIN err), or * the chain(ext2_get_branch() returns -EAGAIN err), or
* if the chain has been changed after we grab the semaphore, * if the chain has been changed after we grab the semaphore,
* (either because another process truncated this branch, or * (either because another process truncated this branch, or
* another get_block allocated this branch) re-grab the chain to see if * another get_block allocated this branch) re-grab the chain to see if
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment