Commit 74e919d2 authored by Johannes Berg's avatar Johannes Berg Committed by Richard Weinberger

um: virtio: clean up a comment

There's no 'simtime' device, because implementing that through
virtio was just too much complexity. Clean up the comment that
still refers to it.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
parent 92bf2261
......@@ -914,8 +914,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vu_setup_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev,
#ifdef CONFIG_UML_TIME_TRAVEL_SUPPORT
/*
* When we get an interrupt, we must bounce it through the simulation
* calendar (the simtime device), except for the simtime device itself
* since that's part of the simulation control.
* calendar (the time-travel=ext:... socket).
*/
if (time_travel_mode == TT_MODE_EXTERNAL && callback) {
info->callback = callback;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment