Commit 770f0cea authored by Jakub Kicinski's avatar Jakub Kicinski Committed by David S. Miller

nfp: don't add ring size to index calculations

Adding ring size to index calculation is pointless, since index
will be masked with ring size - 1.
Suggested-by: default avatarDavid Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 193d6218
......@@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ static void nfp_net_tx_complete(struct nfp_net_tx_ring *tx_ring)
if (qcp_rd_p == tx_ring->qcp_rd_p)
return;
todo = D_IDX(tx_ring, qcp_rd_p + tx_ring->cnt - tx_ring->qcp_rd_p);
todo = D_IDX(tx_ring, qcp_rd_p - tx_ring->qcp_rd_p);
while (todo--) {
idx = D_IDX(tx_ring, tx_ring->rd_p++);
......@@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ static bool nfp_net_xdp_complete(struct nfp_net_tx_ring *tx_ring)
if (qcp_rd_p == tx_ring->qcp_rd_p)
return true;
todo = D_IDX(tx_ring, qcp_rd_p + tx_ring->cnt - tx_ring->qcp_rd_p);
todo = D_IDX(tx_ring, qcp_rd_p - tx_ring->qcp_rd_p);
done_all = todo <= NFP_NET_XDP_MAX_COMPLETE;
todo = min(todo, NFP_NET_XDP_MAX_COMPLETE);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment