Commit 779adf0f authored by David Sterba's avatar David Sterba

btrfs: remove extra barrier before waitqueue_active

Removing barriers is scary, but a call to atomic_dec_and_test implies
a barrier, so we don't need to issue another one.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent a83342aa
......@@ -229,7 +229,9 @@ int btrfs_pin_log_trans(struct btrfs_root *root)
void btrfs_end_log_trans(struct btrfs_root *root)
{
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&root->log_writers)) {
smp_mb();
/*
* Implicit memory barrier after atomic_dec_and_test
*/
if (waitqueue_active(&root->log_writer_wait))
wake_up(&root->log_writer_wait);
}
......@@ -2820,7 +2822,9 @@ int btrfs_sync_log(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
mutex_lock(&log_root_tree->log_mutex);
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&log_root_tree->log_writers)) {
smp_mb();
/*
* Implicit memory barrier after atomic_dec_and_test
*/
if (waitqueue_active(&log_root_tree->log_writer_wait))
wake_up(&log_root_tree->log_writer_wait);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment