Commit 78c3d954 authored by Marco Elver's avatar Marco Elver Committed by Paul E. McKenney

kcsan: Move ctx to start of argument list

It is clearer if ctx is at the start of the function argument list;
it'll be more consistent when adding functions with varying arguments
but all requiring ctx.

No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
parent d627c537
......@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static noinline void kcsan_check_scoped_accesses(void)
/* Rules for generic atomic accesses. Called from fast-path. */
static __always_inline bool
is_atomic(const volatile void *ptr, size_t size, int type, struct kcsan_ctx *ctx)
is_atomic(struct kcsan_ctx *ctx, const volatile void *ptr, size_t size, int type)
{
if (type & KCSAN_ACCESS_ATOMIC)
return true;
......@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ is_atomic(const volatile void *ptr, size_t size, int type, struct kcsan_ctx *ctx
}
static __always_inline bool
should_watch(const volatile void *ptr, size_t size, int type, struct kcsan_ctx *ctx)
should_watch(struct kcsan_ctx *ctx, const volatile void *ptr, size_t size, int type)
{
/*
* Never set up watchpoints when memory operations are atomic.
......@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ should_watch(const volatile void *ptr, size_t size, int type, struct kcsan_ctx *
* should not count towards skipped instructions, and (2) to actually
* decrement kcsan_atomic_next for consecutive instruction stream.
*/
if (is_atomic(ptr, size, type, ctx))
if (is_atomic(ctx, ptr, size, type))
return false;
if (this_cpu_dec_return(kcsan_skip) >= 0)
......@@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ check_access(const volatile void *ptr, size_t size, int type, unsigned long ip)
else {
struct kcsan_ctx *ctx = get_ctx(); /* Call only once in fast-path. */
if (unlikely(should_watch(ptr, size, type, ctx)))
if (unlikely(should_watch(ctx, ptr, size, type)))
kcsan_setup_watchpoint(ptr, size, type, ip);
else if (unlikely(ctx->scoped_accesses.prev))
kcsan_check_scoped_accesses();
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment