Commit 7b2e932f authored by Vineet Gupta's avatar Vineet Gupta

ARCv2: don't assume core 0x54 has dual issue

The first release of core4 (0x54) was dual issue only (HS4x).
Newer releases allow hardware to be configured as single issue (HS3x)
or dual issue.

Prevent accessing a HS4x only aux register in HS3x, which otherwise
leads to illegal instruction exceptions
Signed-off-by: default avatarVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
parent b6835ea7
......@@ -151,6 +151,14 @@ struct bcr_isa_arcv2 {
#endif
};
struct bcr_uarch_build_arcv2 {
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
unsigned int pad:8, prod:8, maj:8, min:8;
#else
unsigned int min:8, maj:8, prod:8, pad:8;
#endif
};
struct bcr_mpy {
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
unsigned int pad:8, x1616:8, dsp:4, cycles:2, type:2, ver:8;
......
......@@ -199,13 +199,29 @@ static void read_arc_build_cfg_regs(void)
cpu->bpu.ret_stk = 4 << bpu.rse;
if (cpu->core.family >= 0x54) {
unsigned int exec_ctrl;
READ_BCR(AUX_EXEC_CTRL, exec_ctrl);
cpu->extn.dual_enb = !(exec_ctrl & 1);
struct bcr_uarch_build_arcv2 uarch;
/* dual issue always present for this core */
cpu->extn.dual = 1;
/*
* The first 0x54 core (uarch maj:min 0:1 or 0:2) was
* dual issue only (HS4x). But next uarch rev (1:0)
* allows it be configured for single issue (HS3x)
* Ensure we fiddle with dual issue only on HS4x
*/
READ_BCR(ARC_REG_MICRO_ARCH_BCR, uarch);
if (uarch.prod == 4) {
unsigned int exec_ctrl;
/* dual issue hardware always present */
cpu->extn.dual = 1;
READ_BCR(AUX_EXEC_CTRL, exec_ctrl);
/* dual issue hardware enabled ? */
cpu->extn.dual_enb = !(exec_ctrl & 1);
}
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment