Commit 7bb49709 authored by Arnd Bergmann's avatar Arnd Bergmann Committed by Ingo Molnar

efi/cper: Avoid using get_seconds()

get_seconds() is deprecated because of the 32-bit time overflow
in y2038/y2106 on 32-bit architectures. The way it is used in
cper_next_record_id() causes an overflow in 2106 when unsigned UTC
seconds overflow, even on 64-bit architectures.

This starts using ktime_get_real_seconds() to give us more than 32 bits
of timestamp on all architectures, and then changes the algorithm to use
39 bits for the timestamp after the y2038 wrap date, plus an always-1
bit at the top. This gives us another 127 epochs of 136 years, with
strictly monotonically increasing sequence numbers across boots.

This is almost certainly overkill, but seems better than just extending
the deadline from 2038 to 2106.
Signed-off-by: default avatarArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180711094040.12506-5-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 3eb420e7
...@@ -48,8 +48,21 @@ u64 cper_next_record_id(void) ...@@ -48,8 +48,21 @@ u64 cper_next_record_id(void)
{ {
static atomic64_t seq; static atomic64_t seq;
if (!atomic64_read(&seq)) if (!atomic64_read(&seq)) {
atomic64_set(&seq, ((u64)get_seconds()) << 32); time64_t time = ktime_get_real_seconds();
/*
* This code is unlikely to still be needed in year 2106,
* but just in case, let's use a few more bits for timestamps
* after y2038 to be sure they keep increasing monotonically
* for the next few hundred years...
*/
if (time < 0x80000000)
atomic64_set(&seq, (ktime_get_real_seconds()) << 32);
else
atomic64_set(&seq, 0x8000000000000000ull |
ktime_get_real_seconds() << 24);
}
return atomic64_inc_return(&seq); return atomic64_inc_return(&seq);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment