Commit 7bc590b2 authored by Sakari Ailus's avatar Sakari Ailus Committed by Jonathan Corbet

Documentation: DMA API: Be more explicit that nents is always the same

The nents argument to the DMA API functions operating on scatterlists is
always the same. The documentation used different argument names and the
matter was not mentioned in Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt at all. Fix
these.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
parent c6045031
......@@ -681,6 +681,11 @@ or:
as appropriate.
PLEASE NOTE: The 'nents' argument to dma_sync_sg_for_cpu() and
dma_sync_sg_for_device() must be the same passed to
dma_map_sg(). It is _NOT_ the count returned by
dma_map_sg().
After the last DMA transfer call one of the DMA unmap routines
dma_unmap_{single,sg}(). If you don't touch the data from the first
dma_map_*() call till dma_unmap_*(), then you don't have to call the
......
......@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ accessed sg->address and sg->length as shown above.
void
dma_unmap_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
int nhwentries, enum dma_data_direction direction)
int nents, enum dma_data_direction direction)
Unmap the previously mapped scatter/gather list. All the parameters
must be the same as those and passed in to the scatter/gather mapping
......@@ -356,10 +356,10 @@ void
dma_sync_single_for_device(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_handle, size_t size,
enum dma_data_direction direction)
void
dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, int nelems,
dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, int nents,
enum dma_data_direction direction)
void
dma_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, int nelems,
dma_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, int nents,
enum dma_data_direction direction)
Synchronise a single contiguous or scatter/gather mapping for the CPU
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment