Commit 7bdfa68c authored by J. Bruce Fields's avatar J. Bruce Fields Committed by Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] knfsd: nfsd4: relax checking of ACL inheritance bits

The rfc allows us to be more permissive about the ACL inheritance bits we
accept:

	"If the server supports a single "inherit ACE" flag that applies to
	both files and directories, the server may reject the request
	(i.e., requiring the client to set both the file and directory
	inheritance flags). The server may also accept the request and
	silently turn on the ACE4_DIRECTORY_INHERIT_ACE flag."

Let's take the latter option--the ACL is a complex attribute that could be
rejected for a wide variety of reasons, and the protocol gives us little
ability to explain the reason for the rejection, so erroring out is a
user-unfriendly last resort.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent f534a257
......@@ -61,9 +61,11 @@
/* flags used to simulate posix default ACLs */
#define NFS4_INHERITANCE_FLAGS (NFS4_ACE_FILE_INHERIT_ACE \
| NFS4_ACE_DIRECTORY_INHERIT_ACE | NFS4_ACE_INHERIT_ONLY_ACE)
| NFS4_ACE_DIRECTORY_INHERIT_ACE)
#define NFS4_SUPPORTED_FLAGS (NFS4_INHERITANCE_FLAGS | NFS4_ACE_IDENTIFIER_GROUP)
#define NFS4_SUPPORTED_FLAGS (NFS4_INHERITANCE_FLAGS \
| NFS4_ACE_INHERIT_ONLY_ACE \
| NFS4_ACE_IDENTIFIER_GROUP)
#define MASK_EQUAL(mask1, mask2) \
( ((mask1) & NFS4_ACE_MASK_ALL) == ((mask2) & NFS4_ACE_MASK_ALL) )
......@@ -707,11 +709,16 @@ nfs4_acl_split(struct nfs4_acl *acl, struct nfs4_acl *dacl)
if (ace->flag & ~NFS4_SUPPORTED_FLAGS)
return -EINVAL;
switch (ace->flag & NFS4_INHERITANCE_FLAGS) {
case 0:
if ((ace->flag & NFS4_INHERITANCE_FLAGS) == 0) {
/* Leave this ace in the effective acl: */
continue;
case NFS4_INHERITANCE_FLAGS:
}
/*
* Note that when only one of FILE_INHERIT or DIRECTORY_INHERIT
* is set, we're effectively turning on the other. That's OK,
* according to rfc 3530.
*/
if (ace->flag & NFS4_ACE_INHERIT_ONLY_ACE) {
/* Add this ace to the default acl and remove it
* from the effective acl: */
error = nfs4_acl_add_ace(dacl, ace->type, ace->flag,
......@@ -721,17 +728,13 @@ nfs4_acl_split(struct nfs4_acl *acl, struct nfs4_acl *dacl)
list_del(h);
kfree(ace);
acl->naces--;
break;
case NFS4_INHERITANCE_FLAGS & ~NFS4_ACE_INHERIT_ONLY_ACE:
} else {
/* Add this ace to the default, but leave it in
* the effective acl as well: */
error = nfs4_acl_add_ace(dacl, ace->type, ace->flag,
ace->access_mask, ace->whotype, ace->who);
if (error)
return error;
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
}
return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment