Btrfs: count devices correctly in readahead during RAID 5/6 replace
Commit 5fbc7c59 ("Btrfs: fix unfinished readahead thread for raid5/6 degraded mounting") fixed a problem where we would skip a missing device when we shouldn't have because there are no other mirrors to read from in RAID 5/6. After commit 2c8cdd6e ("Btrfs, replace: write dirty pages into the replace target device"), the fix doesn't work when we're doing a missing device replace on RAID 5/6 because the replace device is counted as a mirror so we're tricked into thinking we can safely skip the missing device. The fix is to count only the real stripes and decide based on that. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment