Commit 7ccd0791 authored by Jan Kara's avatar Jan Kara Committed by Jens Axboe

loop: Push loop_ctl_mutex down into loop_clr_fd()

loop_clr_fd() has a weird locking convention that is expects
loop_ctl_mutex held, releases it on success and keeps it on failure.
Untangle the mess by moving locking of loop_ctl_mutex into
loop_clr_fd().
Signed-off-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent a2505b79
......@@ -1027,15 +1027,22 @@ loop_init_xfer(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_func_table *xfer,
static int __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
{
struct file *filp = lo->lo_backing_file;
struct file *filp = NULL;
gfp_t gfp = lo->old_gfp_mask;
struct block_device *bdev = lo->lo_device;
int err = 0;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lo->lo_state != Lo_rundown))
return -ENXIO;
mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lo->lo_state != Lo_rundown)) {
err = -ENXIO;
goto out_unlock;
}
if (filp == NULL)
return -EINVAL;
filp = lo->lo_backing_file;
if (filp == NULL) {
err = -EINVAL;
goto out_unlock;
}
/* freeze request queue during the transition */
blk_mq_freeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
......@@ -1082,6 +1089,7 @@ static int __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
if (!part_shift)
lo->lo_disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
loop_unprepare_queue(lo);
out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
/*
* Need not hold loop_ctl_mutex to fput backing file.
......@@ -1089,14 +1097,22 @@ static int __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
* lock dependency possibility warning as fput can take
* bd_mutex which is usually taken before loop_ctl_mutex.
*/
fput(filp);
return 0;
if (filp)
fput(filp);
return err;
}
static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
{
if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound)
int err;
err = mutex_lock_killable_nested(&loop_ctl_mutex, 1);
if (err)
return err;
if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound) {
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
return -ENXIO;
}
/*
* If we've explicitly asked to tear down the loop device,
* and it has an elevated reference count, set it for auto-teardown when
......@@ -1113,6 +1129,7 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
return 0;
}
lo->lo_state = Lo_rundown;
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
return __loop_clr_fd(lo);
}
......@@ -1447,14 +1464,7 @@ static int lo_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
break;
case LOOP_CLR_FD:
err = mutex_lock_killable_nested(&loop_ctl_mutex, 1);
if (err)
return err;
/* loop_clr_fd would have unlocked loop_ctl_mutex on success */
err = loop_clr_fd(lo);
if (err)
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
break;
return loop_clr_fd(lo);
case LOOP_SET_STATUS:
err = -EPERM;
if ((mode & FMODE_WRITE) || capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
......@@ -1690,7 +1700,6 @@ static int lo_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
{
struct loop_device *lo;
int err;
mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
lo = disk->private_data;
......@@ -1701,13 +1710,13 @@ static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound)
goto out_unlock;
lo->lo_state = Lo_rundown;
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
/*
* In autoclear mode, stop the loop thread
* and remove configuration after last close.
*/
err = __loop_clr_fd(lo);
if (!err)
return;
__loop_clr_fd(lo);
return;
} else if (lo->lo_state == Lo_bound) {
/*
* Otherwise keep thread (if running) and config,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment