Commit 7d5843b7 authored by Johan Hedberg's avatar Johan Hedberg Committed by Marcel Holtmann

Bluetooth: Remove unnecessary SMP STK define

We never store the "master" type of STKs since we request encryption
directly with them so we only need one STK type (the one that's
looked-up on the slave side). Simply remove the unnecessary define and
rename the _SLAVE one to the shorter form.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
parent c29d2444
......@@ -349,7 +349,6 @@ enum {
#define HCI_LK_AUTH_COMBINATION_P256 0x08
/* The spec doesn't define types for SMP keys, the _MASTER suffix is implied */
#define HCI_SMP_STK 0x80
#define HCI_SMP_STK_SLAVE 0x81
#define HCI_SMP_LTK 0x82
#define HCI_SMP_LTK_SLAVE 0x83
......
......@@ -4241,7 +4241,7 @@ static void hci_le_ltk_request_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
* distribute the keys. Later, security can be re-established
* using a distributed LTK.
*/
if (ltk->type == HCI_SMP_STK_SLAVE) {
if (ltk->type == HCI_SMP_STK) {
list_del(&ltk->list);
kfree(ltk);
}
......
......@@ -568,8 +568,12 @@ static u8 smp_random(struct smp_chan *smp)
else
auth = 0;
/* Even though there's no _SLAVE suffix this is the
* slave STK we're adding for later lookup (the master
* STK never needs to be stored).
*/
hci_add_ltk(hcon->hdev, &hcon->dst, hcon->dst_type,
HCI_SMP_STK_SLAVE, auth, stk, smp->enc_key_size,
HCI_SMP_STK, auth, stk, smp->enc_key_size,
ediv, rand);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment