Commit 7dae5f08 authored by Mark Rutland's avatar Mark Rutland Committed by Catalin Marinas

arm64: cpufeature: fold cpus_set_cap() into update_cpu_capabilities()

We only use cpus_set_cap() in update_cpu_capabilities(), where we
open-code an analgous update to boot_cpucaps.

Due to the way the cpucap_ptrs[] array is initialized, we know that the
capability number cannot be greater than or equal to ARM64_NCAPS, so the
warning is superfluous.

Fold cpus_set_cap() into update_cpu_capabilities(), matching what we do
for the boot_cpucaps, and making the relationship between the two a bit
clearer.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230607164846.3967305-5-mark.rutland@arm.comSigned-off-by: default avatarCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
parent 1c8ae429
......@@ -504,16 +504,6 @@ static __always_inline bool cpus_have_const_cap(int num)
return cpus_have_cap(num);
}
static inline void cpus_set_cap(unsigned int num)
{
if (num >= ARM64_NCAPS) {
pr_warn("Attempt to set an illegal CPU capability (%d >= %d)\n",
num, ARM64_NCAPS);
} else {
__set_bit(num, system_cpucaps);
}
}
static inline int __attribute_const__
cpuid_feature_extract_signed_field_width(u64 features, int field, int width)
{
......
......@@ -2903,7 +2903,8 @@ static void update_cpu_capabilities(u16 scope_mask)
if (caps->desc)
pr_info("detected: %s\n", caps->desc);
cpus_set_cap(caps->capability);
__set_bit(caps->capability, system_cpucaps);
if ((scope_mask & SCOPE_BOOT_CPU) && (caps->type & SCOPE_BOOT_CPU))
set_bit(caps->capability, boot_cpucaps);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment