sched/numa: Document usages of mm->numa_scan_seq

The p->mm->numa_scan_seq is accessed using READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE
and modified without exclusive access. It is not clear why it is
accessed this way. This patch provides some documentation on that.
Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1430440094.2475.61.camel@j-VirtualBoxSigned-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

kernel/sched/fair.c

@@ -1794,6 +1794,11 @@ static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
 	u64 runtime, period;
 	spinlock_t *group_lock = NULL;
 
+	/*
+	 * The p->mm->numa_scan_seq field gets updated without
+	 * exclusive access. Use READ_ONCE() here to ensure
+	 * that the field is read in a single access:
+	 */
 	seq = READ_ONCE(p->mm->numa_scan_seq);
 	if (p->numa_scan_seq == seq)
 		return;
@@ -2107,6 +2112,14 @@ void task_numa_fault(int last_cpupid, int mem_node, int pages, int flags)
 
 static void reset_ptenuma_scan(struct task_struct *p)
 {
+	/*
+	 * We only did a read acquisition of the mmap sem, so
+	 * p->mm->numa_scan_seq is written to without exclusive access
+	 * and the update is not guaranteed to be atomic. That's not
+	 * much of an issue though, since this is just used for
+	 * statistical sampling. Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE, which are not
+	 * expensive, to avoid any form of compiler optimizations:
+	 */
 	WRITE_ONCE(p->mm->numa_scan_seq, READ_ONCE(p->mm->numa_scan_seq) + 1);
 	p->mm->numa_scan_offset = 0;
 }