Commit 80f60a91 authored by Matteo Croce's avatar Matteo Croce Committed by David S. Miller

mvpp2: remove misleading comment

Recycling in mvpp2 has gone long time ago, but two comment still refers
to it. Remove those two misleading comments as they generate confusion.

Fixes: 7ef7e1d9 ("net: mvpp2: drop useless fields in mvpp2_bm_pool and related code")
Signed-off-by: default avatarMatteo Croce <mcroce@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent bc389189
...@@ -2863,7 +2863,7 @@ static void mvpp2_rx_csum(struct mvpp2_port *port, u32 status, ...@@ -2863,7 +2863,7 @@ static void mvpp2_rx_csum(struct mvpp2_port *port, u32 status,
skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE; skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
} }
/* Reuse skb if possible, or allocate a new skb and add it to BM pool */ /* Allocate a new skb and add it to BM pool */
static int mvpp2_rx_refill(struct mvpp2_port *port, static int mvpp2_rx_refill(struct mvpp2_port *port,
struct mvpp2_bm_pool *bm_pool, int pool) struct mvpp2_bm_pool *bm_pool, int pool)
{ {
...@@ -2871,7 +2871,6 @@ static int mvpp2_rx_refill(struct mvpp2_port *port, ...@@ -2871,7 +2871,6 @@ static int mvpp2_rx_refill(struct mvpp2_port *port,
phys_addr_t phys_addr; phys_addr_t phys_addr;
void *buf; void *buf;
/* No recycle or too many buffers are in use, so allocate a new skb */
buf = mvpp2_buf_alloc(port, bm_pool, &dma_addr, &phys_addr, buf = mvpp2_buf_alloc(port, bm_pool, &dma_addr, &phys_addr,
GFP_ATOMIC); GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!buf) if (!buf)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment