Commit 83566d13 authored by Ville Syrjälä's avatar Ville Syrjälä

drm/i915: Fix the DDI encoder names

I totally fumbled the ?: usage when generating the DDI encoder
names. Reverse the things that need reversing, and to make it
a bit less messy add a few macros to hide the arithmetic on the
port enums.

Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: 2d709a5a ("drm/i915: Give DDI encoders even better names")
Signed-off-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201117154028.8516-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: default avatarLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
parent b896898c
......@@ -5295,6 +5295,9 @@ static enum hpd_pin cnl_hpd_pin(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
return HPD_PORT_A + port - PORT_A;
}
#define port_tc_name(port) ((port) - PORT_TC1 + '1')
#define tc_port_name(tc_port) ((tc_port) - TC_PORT_1 + '1')
void intel_ddi_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port)
{
struct intel_digital_port *dig_port;
......@@ -5350,9 +5353,9 @@ void intel_ddi_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port)
DRM_MODE_ENCODER_TMDS,
"DDI %s%c/PHY %s%c",
port >= PORT_TC1 ? "TC" : "",
port >= PORT_TC1 ? port_name(port) : port - PORT_TC1 + '1',
port >= PORT_TC1 ? port_tc_name(port) : port_name(port),
tc_port != TC_PORT_NONE ? "TC" : "",
tc_port != TC_PORT_NONE ? phy_name(phy) : tc_port - TC_PORT_1 + '1');
tc_port != TC_PORT_NONE ? tc_port_name(tc_port) : phy_name(phy));
} else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
enum tc_port tc_port = intel_port_to_tc(dev_priv, port);
......@@ -5362,7 +5365,7 @@ void intel_ddi_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port)
port_name(port),
port >= PORT_C ? " (TC)" : "",
tc_port != TC_PORT_NONE ? "TC" : "",
tc_port != TC_PORT_NONE ? phy_name(phy) : tc_port - TC_PORT_1 + '1');
tc_port != TC_PORT_NONE ? tc_port_name(tc_port) : phy_name(phy));
} else {
drm_encoder_init(&dev_priv->drm, &encoder->base, &intel_ddi_funcs,
DRM_MODE_ENCODER_TMDS,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment