Commit 839a4c3b authored by Florian Westphal's avatar Florian Westphal Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

netfilter: x_tables: add and use xt_check_proc_name

commit b1d0a5d0 upstream.

recent and hashlimit both create /proc files, but only check that
name is 0 terminated.

This can trigger WARN() from procfs when name is "" or "/".
Add helper for this and then use it for both.

Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Reported-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Reported-by: <syzbot+0502b00edac2a0680b61@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 2a55ad74
......@@ -285,6 +285,8 @@ unsigned int *xt_alloc_entry_offsets(unsigned int size);
bool xt_find_jump_offset(const unsigned int *offsets,
unsigned int target, unsigned int size);
int xt_check_proc_name(const char *name, unsigned int size);
int xt_check_match(struct xt_mtchk_param *, unsigned int size, u_int8_t proto,
bool inv_proto);
int xt_check_target(struct xt_tgchk_param *, unsigned int size, u_int8_t proto,
......
......@@ -423,6 +423,36 @@ textify_hooks(char *buf, size_t size, unsigned int mask, uint8_t nfproto)
return buf;
}
/**
* xt_check_proc_name - check that name is suitable for /proc file creation
*
* @name: file name candidate
* @size: length of buffer
*
* some x_tables modules wish to create a file in /proc.
* This function makes sure that the name is suitable for this
* purpose, it checks that name is NUL terminated and isn't a 'special'
* name, like "..".
*
* returns negative number on error or 0 if name is useable.
*/
int xt_check_proc_name(const char *name, unsigned int size)
{
if (name[0] == '\0')
return -EINVAL;
if (strnlen(name, size) == size)
return -ENAMETOOLONG;
if (strcmp(name, ".") == 0 ||
strcmp(name, "..") == 0 ||
strchr(name, '/'))
return -EINVAL;
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(xt_check_proc_name);
int xt_check_match(struct xt_mtchk_param *par,
unsigned int size, u_int8_t proto, bool inv_proto)
{
......
......@@ -915,8 +915,9 @@ static int hashlimit_mt_check_v1(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par)
struct hashlimit_cfg3 cfg = {};
int ret;
if (info->name[sizeof(info->name) - 1] != '\0')
return -EINVAL;
ret = xt_check_proc_name(info->name, sizeof(info->name));
if (ret)
return ret;
ret = cfg_copy(&cfg, (void *)&info->cfg, 1);
......@@ -933,8 +934,9 @@ static int hashlimit_mt_check_v2(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par)
struct hashlimit_cfg3 cfg = {};
int ret;
if (info->name[sizeof(info->name) - 1] != '\0')
return -EINVAL;
ret = xt_check_proc_name(info->name, sizeof(info->name));
if (ret)
return ret;
ret = cfg_copy(&cfg, (void *)&info->cfg, 2);
......@@ -948,9 +950,11 @@ static int hashlimit_mt_check_v2(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par)
static int hashlimit_mt_check(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par)
{
struct xt_hashlimit_mtinfo3 *info = par->matchinfo;
int ret;
if (info->name[sizeof(info->name) - 1] != '\0')
return -EINVAL;
ret = xt_check_proc_name(info->name, sizeof(info->name));
if (ret)
return ret;
return hashlimit_mt_check_common(par, &info->hinfo, &info->cfg,
info->name, 3);
......
......@@ -361,9 +361,9 @@ static int recent_mt_check(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par,
info->hit_count, XT_RECENT_MAX_NSTAMPS - 1);
return -EINVAL;
}
if (info->name[0] == '\0' ||
strnlen(info->name, XT_RECENT_NAME_LEN) == XT_RECENT_NAME_LEN)
return -EINVAL;
ret = xt_check_proc_name(info->name, sizeof(info->name));
if (ret)
return ret;
if (ip_pkt_list_tot && info->hit_count < ip_pkt_list_tot)
nstamp_mask = roundup_pow_of_two(ip_pkt_list_tot) - 1;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment