Commit 83cb8557 authored by Tejun Heo's avatar Tejun Heo

percpu: update incorrect comment for this_cpu_*() operations

this_cpu_*() ops have been protected against both preemption and
interrupts for quite a while now.  We apparently forgot to update the
comment.  Fix it.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
parent d770e558
......@@ -488,10 +488,8 @@ do { \
#define __this_cpu_dec_return(pcp) __this_cpu_add_return(pcp, -1)
/*
* Operations with implied preemption protection. These operations can be
* used without worrying about preemption. Note that interrupts may still
* occur while an operation is in progress and if the interrupt modifies
* the variable too then RMW actions may not be reliable.
* Operations with implied preemption/interrupt protection. These
* operations can be used without worrying about preemption or interrupt.
*/
#define this_cpu_read(pcp) __pcpu_size_call_return(this_cpu_read_, pcp)
#define this_cpu_write(pcp, val) __pcpu_size_call(this_cpu_write_, pcp, val)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment