Btrfs: incremental send, don't rename a directory too soon
There's one more case where we can't issue a rename operation for a directory as soon as we process it. We used to delay directory renames only if they have some ancestor directory with a higher inode number that got renamed too, but there's another case where we need to delay the rename too - when a directory A is renamed to the old name of a directory B but that directory B has its rename delayed because it has now (in the send root) an ancestor with a higher inode number that was renamed. If we don't delay the directory rename in this case, the receiving end of the send stream will attempt to rename A to the old name of B before B got renamed to its new name, which results in a "directory not empty" error. So fix this by delaying directory renames for this case too. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/a $ mkdir /mnt/b $ mkdir /mnt/c $ touch /mnt/a/file $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/c /mnt/x $ mv /mnt/a /mnt/x/y $ mv /mnt/b /mnt/a $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send ERROR: rename b -> a failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Ames Cornish <ames@cornishes.net> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment