arm64: backtrace: Don't bother trying to unwind the userspace stack

commit 1e6f5440 upstream.

Calling dump_backtrace() with a pt_regs argument corresponding to
userspace doesn't make any sense and our unwinder will simply print
"Call trace:" before unwinding the stack looking for user frames.

Rather than go through this song and dance, just return early if we're
passed a user register state.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: 1149aad1 ("arm64: Add dump_backtrace() in show_regs")
Reported-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c

@@ -101,10 +101,16 @@ static void dump_instr(const char *lvl, struct pt_regs *regs)
 void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
 	struct stackframe frame;
-	int skip;
+	int skip = 0;
 
 	pr_debug("%s(regs = %p tsk = %p)\n", __func__, regs, tsk);
 
+	if (regs) {
+		if (user_mode(regs))
+			return;
+		skip = 1;
+	}
+
 	if (!tsk)
 		tsk = current;
 
@@ -125,7 +131,6 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
 	frame.graph = tsk->curr_ret_stack;
 #endif
 
-	skip = !!regs;
 	printk("Call trace:\n");
 	do {
 		/* skip until specified stack frame */
@@ -175,15 +180,13 @@ static int __die(const char *str, int err, struct pt_regs *regs)
 		return ret;
 
 	print_modules();
-	__show_regs(regs);
 	pr_emerg("Process %.*s (pid: %d, stack limit = 0x%p)\n",
 		 TASK_COMM_LEN, tsk->comm, task_pid_nr(tsk),
 		 end_of_stack(tsk));
+	show_regs(regs);
 
-	if (!user_mode(regs)) {
-		dump_backtrace(regs, tsk);
+	if (!user_mode(regs))
 		dump_instr(KERN_EMERG, regs);
-	}
 
 	return ret;
 }