btrfs: cache folio size and shift in extent_buffer
After the conversion to folio interfaces (but without the patch to enable larger folio allocation), there is an LTP report about observable performance drop on metadata heavy operations. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/202312221750.571925bd-oliver.sang@intel.com/ This drop is caused by the extra code of calculating the folio_size()/folio_shift(), instead of the old hard coded PAGE_SIZE/PAGE_SHIFT. To slightly reduce the overhead, just cache both folio_size and folio_shift in extent_buffer. The two new members (u32 folio_size and u8 folio_shift) are stored inside the holes of extent_buffer. folio_size is shared with len, which is reduced to u32. The size of eb does not change. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment