Commit 86d5bc37 authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson Committed by Daniel Vetter

drm/i915: Remove explicit flush from i915_gem_object_flush_fence()

As the flush is either performed explictly immediately after the
execbuffer dispatch, or before the serialisation of last_fenced_seqno we
can forgo the explict i915_gem_flush_ring().
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
parent 69c2fc89
......@@ -2473,21 +2473,8 @@ static void i915_gem_object_update_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
static int
i915_gem_object_flush_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
{
int ret;
if (obj->fenced_gpu_access) {
if (obj->base.write_domain & I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS) {
ret = i915_gem_flush_ring(obj->ring,
0, obj->base.write_domain);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
obj->fenced_gpu_access = false;
}
if (obj->last_fenced_seqno) {
ret = i915_wait_seqno(obj->ring, obj->last_fenced_seqno);
int ret = i915_wait_seqno(obj->ring, obj->last_fenced_seqno);
if (ret)
return ret;
......@@ -2500,6 +2487,7 @@ i915_gem_object_flush_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
if (obj->base.read_domains & I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT)
mb();
obj->fenced_gpu_access = false;
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment