Commit 86e3577f authored by Hans Verkuil's avatar Hans Verkuil Committed by Mauro Carvalho Chehab

[media] cec: don't zero reply and timeout on error

There is really no reason to zero the reply and timeout fields if an
error occurs. This is a left-over from earlier versions where that
was used to signal errors, but this is now handled by the rx/tx_status
fields.
Signed-off-by: default avatarHans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
parent 19e476c7
......@@ -289,7 +289,6 @@ static void cec_data_cancel(struct cec_data *data)
CEC_TX_STATUS_MAX_RETRIES;
data->attempts = 0;
data->msg.tx_error_cnt = 1;
data->msg.reply = 0;
/* Queue transmitted message for monitoring purposes */
cec_queue_msg_monitor(data->adap, &data->msg, 1);
......@@ -511,16 +510,8 @@ void cec_transmit_done(struct cec_adapter *adap, u8 status, u8 arb_lost_cnt,
/* Queue transmitted message for monitoring purposes */
cec_queue_msg_monitor(adap, msg, 1);
/*
* Clear reply and timeout on error or if the adapter is no longer
* configured. It makes no sense to wait for a reply in that case.
*/
if (!(status & CEC_TX_STATUS_OK) || !adap->is_configured) {
msg->reply = 0;
msg->timeout = 0;
}
if (msg->timeout) {
if ((status & CEC_TX_STATUS_OK) && adap->is_configured &&
msg->timeout) {
/*
* Queue the message into the wait queue if we want to wait
* for a reply.
......@@ -648,6 +639,8 @@ int cec_transmit_msg_fh(struct cec_adapter *adap, struct cec_msg *msg,
dprintk(2, "cec_transmit_msg: %*ph%s\n",
msg->len, msg->msg, !block ? " (nb)" : "");
msg->rx_ts = 0;
msg->tx_ts = 0;
msg->rx_status = 0;
msg->tx_status = 0;
msg->tx_arb_lost_cnt = 0;
......@@ -812,10 +805,8 @@ void cec_received_msg(struct cec_adapter *adap, struct cec_msg *msg)
dst->len = msg->len;
dst->rx_ts = msg->rx_ts;
dst->rx_status = msg->rx_status;
if (abort) {
dst->reply = 0;
if (abort)
dst->rx_status |= CEC_RX_STATUS_FEATURE_ABORT;
}
/* Remove it from the wait_queue */
list_del_init(&data->list);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment