Commit 88b28adf authored by Jim Cromie's avatar Jim Cromie Committed by John Stultz

kernel-time: fix s/then/than/ spelling errors

Use than for comparisons, like more than.

CC: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
parent 335dd858
......@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ static u32 clocksource_max_adjustment(struct clocksource *cs)
{
u64 ret;
/*
* We won't try to correct for more then 11% adjustments (110,000 ppm),
* We won't try to correct for more than 11% adjustments (110,000 ppm),
*/
ret = (u64)cs->mult * 11;
do_div(ret,100);
......
......@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ static void timekeeping_adjust(s64 offset)
int adj;
/*
* The point of this is to check if the error is greater then half
* The point of this is to check if the error is greater than half
* an interval.
*
* First we shift it down from NTP_SHIFT to clocksource->shifted nsecs.
......@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ static void timekeeping_adjust(s64 offset)
* Note we subtract one in the shift, so that error is really error*2.
* This "saves" dividing(shifting) interval twice, but keeps the
* (error > interval) comparison as still measuring if error is
* larger then half an interval.
* larger than half an interval.
*
* Note: It does not "save" on aggravation when reading the code.
*/
......@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ static void timekeeping_adjust(s64 offset)
if (error > interval) {
/*
* We now divide error by 4(via shift), which checks if
* the error is greater then twice the interval.
* the error is greater than twice the interval.
* If it is greater, we need a bigadjust, if its smaller,
* we can adjust by 1.
*/
......@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ static cycle_t logarithmic_accumulation(cycle_t offset, int shift)
u64 nsecps = (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC << timekeeper.shift;
u64 raw_nsecs;
/* If the offset is smaller then a shifted interval, do nothing */
/* If the offset is smaller than a shifted interval, do nothing */
if (offset < timekeeper.cycle_interval<<shift)
return offset;
......@@ -1017,13 +1017,13 @@ static void update_wall_time(void)
* With NO_HZ we may have to accumulate many cycle_intervals
* (think "ticks") worth of time at once. To do this efficiently,
* we calculate the largest doubling multiple of cycle_intervals
* that is smaller then the offset. We then accumulate that
* that is smaller than the offset. We then accumulate that
* chunk in one go, and then try to consume the next smaller
* doubled multiple.
*/
shift = ilog2(offset) - ilog2(timekeeper.cycle_interval);
shift = max(0, shift);
/* Bound shift to one less then what overflows tick_length */
/* Bound shift to one less than what overflows tick_length */
maxshift = (64 - (ilog2(ntp_tick_length())+1)) - 1;
shift = min(shift, maxshift);
while (offset >= timekeeper.cycle_interval) {
......@@ -1071,7 +1071,7 @@ static void update_wall_time(void)
/*
* Finally, make sure that after the rounding
* xtime.tv_nsec isn't larger then NSEC_PER_SEC
* xtime.tv_nsec isn't larger than NSEC_PER_SEC
*/
if (unlikely(timekeeper.xtime.tv_nsec >= NSEC_PER_SEC)) {
int leap;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment