nvme-tcp: fix a possible UAF when failing to allocate an io queue
When we allocate a nvme-tcp queue, we set the data_ready callback before we actually need to use it. This creates the potential that if a stray controller sends us data on the socket before we connect, we can trigger the io_work and start consuming the socket. In this case reported: we failed to allocate one of the io queues, and as we start releasing the queues that we already allocated, we get a UAF [1] from the io_work which is running before it should really. Fix this by setting the socket ops callbacks only before we start the queue, so that we can't accidentally schedule the io_work in the initialization phase before the queue started. While we are at it, rename nvme_tcp_restore_sock_calls to pair with nvme_tcp_setup_sock_ops. [1]: [16802.107284] nvme nvme4: starting error recovery [16802.109166] nvme nvme4: Reconnecting in 10 seconds... [16812.173535] nvme nvme4: failed to connect socket: -111 [16812.173745] nvme nvme4: Failed reconnect attempt 1 [16812.173747] nvme nvme4: Reconnecting in 10 seconds... [16822.413555] nvme nvme4: failed to connect socket: -111 [16822.413762] nvme nvme4: Failed reconnect attempt 2 [16822.413765] nvme nvme4: Reconnecting in 10 seconds... [16832.661274] nvme nvme4: creating 32 I/O queues. [16833.919887] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000088 [16833.920068] nvme nvme4: Failed reconnect attempt 3 [16833.920094] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode [16833.920261] nvme nvme4: Reconnecting in 10 seconds... [16833.920368] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page [16833.921086] Workqueue: nvme_tcp_wq nvme_tcp_io_work [nvme_tcp] [16833.921191] RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x17/0x30 ... [16833.923138] Call Trace: [16833.923271] <TASK> [16833.923402] lock_sock_nested+0x1e/0x50 [16833.923545] nvme_tcp_try_recv+0x40/0xa0 [nvme_tcp] [16833.923685] nvme_tcp_io_work+0x68/0xa0 [nvme_tcp] [16833.923824] process_one_work+0x1e8/0x390 [16833.923969] worker_thread+0x53/0x3d0 [16833.924104] ? process_one_work+0x390/0x390 [16833.924240] kthread+0x124/0x150 [16833.924376] ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50 [16833.924518] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [16833.924655] </TASK> Reported-by: Yanjun Zhang <zhangyanjun@cestc.cn> Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Tested-by: Yanjun Zhang <zhangyanjun@cestc.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment