Commit 89ffcdba authored by Ben Dooks's avatar Ben Dooks Committed by Tony Lindgren

ARM: OMAP2+: prm44xx: make prm_{save,restore}_context static

The prm_{save,restore}_context functions are not exported
so make them static to avoid the following warnings:

arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c:748:6: warning: symbol 'prm_save_context' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c:759:6: warning: symbol 'prm_restore_context' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
parent 607295af
...@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ struct pwrdm_ops omap4_pwrdm_operations = { ...@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ struct pwrdm_ops omap4_pwrdm_operations = {
static int omap44xx_prm_late_init(void); static int omap44xx_prm_late_init(void);
void prm_save_context(void) static void prm_save_context(void)
{ {
omap_prm_context.irq_enable = omap_prm_context.irq_enable =
omap4_prm_read_inst_reg(AM43XX_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST, omap4_prm_read_inst_reg(AM43XX_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
...@@ -756,7 +756,7 @@ void prm_save_context(void) ...@@ -756,7 +756,7 @@ void prm_save_context(void)
omap4_prcm_irq_setup.pm_ctrl); omap4_prcm_irq_setup.pm_ctrl);
} }
void prm_restore_context(void) static void prm_restore_context(void)
{ {
omap4_prm_write_inst_reg(omap_prm_context.irq_enable, omap4_prm_write_inst_reg(omap_prm_context.irq_enable,
OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST, OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment