Commit 8a6edb52 authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched: Fix migration_cpu_stop() requeueing

When affine_move_task(p) is called on a running task @p, which is not
otherwise already changing affinity, we'll first set
p->migration_pending and then do:

	 stop_one_cpu(cpu_of_rq(rq), migration_cpu_stop, &arg);

This then gets us to migration_cpu_stop() running on the CPU that was
previously running our victim task @p.

If we find that our task is no longer on that runqueue (this can
happen because of a concurrent migration due to load-balance etc.),
then we'll end up at the:

	} else if (dest_cpu < 1 || pending) {

branch. Which we'll take because we set pending earlier. Here we first
check if the task @p has already satisfied the affinity constraints,
if so we bail early [A]. Otherwise we'll reissue migration_cpu_stop()
onto the CPU that is now hosting our task @p:

	stop_one_cpu_nowait(cpu_of(rq), migration_cpu_stop,
			    &pending->arg, &pending->stop_work);

Except, we've never initialized pending->arg, which will be all 0s.

This then results in running migration_cpu_stop() on the next CPU with
arg->p == NULL, which gives the by now obvious result of fireworks.

The cure is to change affine_move_task() to always use pending->arg,
furthermore we can use the exact same pattern as the
SCA_MIGRATE_ENABLE case, since we'll block on the pending->done
completion anyway, no point in adding yet another completion in
stop_one_cpu().

This then gives a clear distinction between the two
migration_cpu_stop() use cases:

  - sched_exec() / migrate_task_to() : arg->pending == NULL
  - affine_move_task() : arg->pending != NULL;

And we can have it ignore p->migration_pending when !arg->pending. Any
stop work from sched_exec() / migrate_task_to() is in addition to stop
works from affine_move_task(), which will be sufficient to issue the
completion.

Fixes: 6d337eab ("sched: Fix migrate_disable() vs set_cpus_allowed_ptr()")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarValentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210224131355.357743989@infradead.org
parent a38fd874
...@@ -1922,6 +1922,24 @@ static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data) ...@@ -1922,6 +1922,24 @@ static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data)
rq_lock(rq, &rf); rq_lock(rq, &rf);
pending = p->migration_pending; pending = p->migration_pending;
if (pending && !arg->pending) {
/*
* This happens from sched_exec() and migrate_task_to(),
* neither of them care about pending and just want a task to
* maybe move about.
*
* Even if there is a pending, we can ignore it, since
* affine_move_task() will have it's own stop_work's in flight
* which will manage the completion.
*
* Notably, pending doesn't need to match arg->pending. This can
* happen when tripple concurrent affine_move_task() first sets
* pending, then clears pending and eventually sets another
* pending.
*/
pending = NULL;
}
/* /*
* If task_rq(p) != rq, it cannot be migrated here, because we're * If task_rq(p) != rq, it cannot be migrated here, because we're
* holding rq->lock, if p->on_rq == 0 it cannot get enqueued because * holding rq->lock, if p->on_rq == 0 it cannot get enqueued because
...@@ -2194,10 +2212,6 @@ static int affine_move_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flag ...@@ -2194,10 +2212,6 @@ static int affine_move_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flag
int dest_cpu, unsigned int flags) int dest_cpu, unsigned int flags)
{ {
struct set_affinity_pending my_pending = { }, *pending = NULL; struct set_affinity_pending my_pending = { }, *pending = NULL;
struct migration_arg arg = {
.task = p,
.dest_cpu = dest_cpu,
};
bool complete = false; bool complete = false;
/* Can the task run on the task's current CPU? If so, we're done */ /* Can the task run on the task's current CPU? If so, we're done */
...@@ -2235,6 +2249,12 @@ static int affine_move_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flag ...@@ -2235,6 +2249,12 @@ static int affine_move_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flag
/* Install the request */ /* Install the request */
refcount_set(&my_pending.refs, 1); refcount_set(&my_pending.refs, 1);
init_completion(&my_pending.done); init_completion(&my_pending.done);
my_pending.arg = (struct migration_arg) {
.task = p,
.dest_cpu = -1, /* any */
.pending = &my_pending,
};
p->migration_pending = &my_pending; p->migration_pending = &my_pending;
} else { } else {
pending = p->migration_pending; pending = p->migration_pending;
...@@ -2265,12 +2285,6 @@ static int affine_move_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flag ...@@ -2265,12 +2285,6 @@ static int affine_move_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flag
p->migration_flags &= ~MDF_PUSH; p->migration_flags &= ~MDF_PUSH;
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, rf); task_rq_unlock(rq, p, rf);
pending->arg = (struct migration_arg) {
.task = p,
.dest_cpu = -1,
.pending = pending,
};
stop_one_cpu_nowait(cpu_of(rq), migration_cpu_stop, stop_one_cpu_nowait(cpu_of(rq), migration_cpu_stop,
&pending->arg, &pending->stop_work); &pending->arg, &pending->stop_work);
...@@ -2283,8 +2297,11 @@ static int affine_move_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flag ...@@ -2283,8 +2297,11 @@ static int affine_move_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flag
* is_migration_disabled(p) checks to the stopper, which will * is_migration_disabled(p) checks to the stopper, which will
* run on the same CPU as said p. * run on the same CPU as said p.
*/ */
refcount_inc(&pending->refs); /* pending->{arg,stop_work} */
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, rf); task_rq_unlock(rq, p, rf);
stop_one_cpu(cpu_of(rq), migration_cpu_stop, &arg);
stop_one_cpu_nowait(cpu_of(rq), migration_cpu_stop,
&pending->arg, &pending->stop_work);
} else { } else {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment