KVM: x86: hyper-v: Fix 'using uninitialized value' Coverity warning
In kvm_hv_flush_tlb(), 'data_offset' and 'consumed_xmm_halves' variables are used in a mutually exclusive way: in 'hc->fast' we count in 'XMM halves' and increase 'data_offset' otherwise. Coverity discovered, that in one case both variables are incremented unconditionally. This doesn't seem to cause any issues as the only user of 'data_offset'/'consumed_xmm_halves' data is kvm_hv_get_tlb_flush_entries() -> kvm_hv_get_hc_data() which also takes into account 'hc->fast' but is still worth fixing. To make things explicit, put 'data_offset' and 'consumed_xmm_halves' to 'struct kvm_hv_hcall' as a union and use at call sites. This allows to remove explicit 'data_offset'/'consumed_xmm_halves' parameters from kvm_hv_get_hc_data()/kvm_get_sparse_vp_set()/kvm_hv_get_tlb_flush_entries() helpers. Note: 'struct kvm_hv_hcall' is allocated on stack in kvm_hv_hypercall() and is not zeroed, consumers are supposed to initialize the appropriate field if needed. Reported-by: coverity-bot <keescook+coverity-bot@chromium.org> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1527764 ("Uninitialized variables") Fixes: 26097086 ("KVM: x86: hyper-v: Handle HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST{,EX} calls gently") Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Message-Id: <20221208102700.959630-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment