Commit 8c6a3ee6 authored by Miao Xie's avatar Miao Xie Committed by Josef Bacik

Btrfs: add a comment for fs_info->max_inline

Though ->max_inline is a 64bit variant, and may be accessed by
multi-task, but it is just suggestive number, so we needn't add
anything to protect fs_info->max_inline, just add a comment to
explain wny we don't use a lock to protect it.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
parent 55e301fd
......@@ -1297,6 +1297,12 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info {
u64 last_trans_log_full_commit;
unsigned long mount_opt;
unsigned long compress_type:4;
/*
* It is a suggestive number, the read side is safe even it gets a
* wrong number because we will write out the data into a regular
* extent. The write side(mount/remount) is under ->s_umount lock,
* so it is also safe.
*/
u64 max_inline;
u64 alloc_start;
struct btrfs_transaction *running_transaction;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment