Commit 8e97d9ef authored by Daniel Vetter's avatar Daniel Vetter

drm/exynos: drop struct_mutex from exynos_gem_map_sgt_with_dma

The sg table isn't refcounted, there's no corresponding locking for
unmapping and drm_map_sg is ok with being called concurrently.

So drop the locking since it doesn't protect anything.

Cc: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1459330852-27668-8-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
parent 91263622
......@@ -388,16 +388,12 @@ int exynos_gem_map_sgt_with_dma(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
{
int nents;
mutex_lock(&drm_dev->struct_mutex);
nents = dma_map_sg(to_dma_dev(drm_dev), sgt->sgl, sgt->nents, dir);
if (!nents) {
DRM_ERROR("failed to map sgl with dma.\n");
mutex_unlock(&drm_dev->struct_mutex);
return nents;
}
mutex_unlock(&drm_dev->struct_mutex);
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment