Commit 8f2484bd authored by Herbert Xu's avatar Herbert Xu Committed by David S. Miller

rhashtable: Use SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING

We only nest one level deep there is no need to roll our own
subclasses.
Signed-off-by: default avatarHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent eddee5ba
......@@ -33,11 +33,6 @@
/* Base bits plus 1 bit for nulls marker */
#define HASH_RESERVED_SPACE (RHT_BASE_BITS + 1)
enum {
RHT_LOCK_NORMAL,
RHT_LOCK_NESTED,
};
/* The bucket lock is selected based on the hash and protects mutations
* on a group of hash buckets.
*
......@@ -231,7 +226,7 @@ static int rhashtable_rehash_one(struct rhashtable *ht, unsigned old_hash)
new_bucket_lock = bucket_lock(new_tbl, new_hash);
spin_lock_nested(new_bucket_lock, RHT_LOCK_NESTED);
spin_lock_nested(new_bucket_lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
head = rht_dereference_bucket(new_tbl->buckets[new_hash],
new_tbl, new_hash);
......@@ -405,7 +400,7 @@ static bool __rhashtable_insert(struct rhashtable *ht, struct rhash_head *obj,
tbl = rht_dereference_rcu(ht->future_tbl, ht);
if (tbl != old_tbl) {
hash = head_hashfn(ht, tbl, obj);
spin_lock_nested(bucket_lock(tbl, hash), RHT_LOCK_NESTED);
spin_lock_nested(bucket_lock(tbl, hash), SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
}
if (compare &&
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment