bpf: Reduce the scope of rcu_read_lock when updating fd map

There is no rcu-read-lock requirement for ops->map_fd_get_ptr() or
ops->map_fd_put_ptr(), so doesn't use rcu-read-lock for these two
callbacks.

For bpf_fd_array_map_update_elem(), accessing array->ptrs doesn't need
rcu-read-lock because array->ptrs must still be allocated. For
bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem(), htab_map_update_elem() only requires
rcu-read-lock to be held to avoid the WARN_ON_ONCE(), so only use
rcu_read_lock() during the invocation of htab_map_update_elem().
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231214043010.3458072-2-houtao@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

kernel/bpf/hashtab.c

@@ -2523,7 +2523,13 @@ int bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, struct file *map_file,
 	if (IS_ERR(ptr))
 		return PTR_ERR(ptr);
 
+	/* The htab bucket lock is always held during update operations in fd
+	 * htab map, and the following rcu_read_lock() is only used to avoid
+	 * the WARN_ON_ONCE in htab_map_update_elem().
+	 */
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	ret = htab_map_update_elem(map, key, &ptr, map_flags);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	if (ret)
 		map->ops->map_fd_put_ptr(map, ptr, false);
 

kernel/bpf/syscall.c

@@ -184,15 +184,11 @@ static int bpf_map_update_value(struct bpf_map *map, struct file *map_file,
 		err = bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(map, key, value,
 						       flags);
 	} else if (IS_FD_ARRAY(map)) {
-		rcu_read_lock();
 		err = bpf_fd_array_map_update_elem(map, map_file, key, value,
 						   flags);
-		rcu_read_unlock();
 	} else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS) {
-		rcu_read_lock();
 		err = bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem(map, map_file, key, value,
 						  flags);
-		rcu_read_unlock();
 	} else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_REUSEPORT_SOCKARRAY) {
 		/* rcu_read_lock() is not needed */
 		err = bpf_fd_reuseport_array_update_elem(map, key, value,