Commit 906f2a51 authored by Kees Cook's avatar Kees Cook Committed by Linus Torvalds

mm: fix section name for .data..ro_after_init

A section name for .data..ro_after_init was added by both:

    commit d07a980c ("s390: add proper __ro_after_init support")

and

    commit d7c19b06 ("mm: kmemleak: scan .data.ro_after_init")

The latter adds incorrect wrapping around the existing s390 section, and
came later.  I'd prefer the s390 naming, so this moves the s390-specific
name up to the asm-generic/sections.h and renames the section as used by
kmemleak (and in the future, kernel/extable.c).

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170327192213.GA129375@beastSigned-off-by: default avatarKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>	[s390 parts]
Acked-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Cc: Eddie Kovsky <ewk@edkovsky.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent c9d398fa
......@@ -4,6 +4,5 @@
#include <asm-generic/sections.h>
extern char _eshared[], _ehead[];
extern char __start_ro_after_init[], __end_ro_after_init[];
#endif
......@@ -63,11 +63,9 @@ SECTIONS
. = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE);
__start_ro_after_init = .;
__start_data_ro_after_init = .;
.data..ro_after_init : {
*(.data..ro_after_init)
}
__end_data_ro_after_init = .;
EXCEPTION_TABLE(16)
. = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE);
__end_ro_after_init = .;
......
......@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
* [_sdata, _edata]: contains .data.* sections, may also contain .rodata.*
* and/or .init.* sections.
* [__start_rodata, __end_rodata]: contains .rodata.* sections
* [__start_data_ro_after_init, __end_data_ro_after_init]:
* contains data.ro_after_init section
* [__start_ro_after_init, __end_ro_after_init]:
* contains .data..ro_after_init section
* [__init_begin, __init_end]: contains .init.* sections, but .init.text.*
* may be out of this range on some architectures.
* [_sinittext, _einittext]: contains .init.text.* sections
......@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ extern char _data[], _sdata[], _edata[];
extern char __bss_start[], __bss_stop[];
extern char __init_begin[], __init_end[];
extern char _sinittext[], _einittext[];
extern char __start_data_ro_after_init[], __end_data_ro_after_init[];
extern char __start_ro_after_init[], __end_ro_after_init[];
extern char _end[];
extern char __per_cpu_load[], __per_cpu_start[], __per_cpu_end[];
extern char __kprobes_text_start[], __kprobes_text_end[];
......
......@@ -260,9 +260,9 @@
*/
#ifndef RO_AFTER_INIT_DATA
#define RO_AFTER_INIT_DATA \
__start_data_ro_after_init = .; \
__start_ro_after_init = .; \
*(.data..ro_after_init) \
__end_data_ro_after_init = .;
__end_ro_after_init = .;
#endif
/*
......
......@@ -1416,7 +1416,7 @@ static void kmemleak_scan(void)
/* data/bss scanning */
scan_large_block(_sdata, _edata);
scan_large_block(__bss_start, __bss_stop);
scan_large_block(__start_data_ro_after_init, __end_data_ro_after_init);
scan_large_block(__start_ro_after_init, __end_ro_after_init);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/* per-cpu sections scanning */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment