Commit 90bf361c authored by John Stultz's avatar John Stultz Committed by Thomas Gleixner

ntp: Introduce and use SECS_PER_DAY macro instead of 86400

Currently the leapsecond logic uses what looks like magic values.

Improve this by defining SECS_PER_DAY and using that macro
to make the logic more clear.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1434063297-28657-3-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
parent d1518326
......@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ unsigned long tick_nsec;
static u64 tick_length;
static u64 tick_length_base;
#define SECS_PER_DAY 86400
#define MAX_TICKADJ 500LL /* usecs */
#define MAX_TICKADJ_SCALED \
(((MAX_TICKADJ * NSEC_PER_USEC) << NTP_SCALE_SHIFT) / NTP_INTERVAL_FREQ)
......@@ -390,7 +391,7 @@ int second_overflow(unsigned long secs)
case TIME_INS:
if (!(time_status & STA_INS))
time_state = TIME_OK;
else if (secs % 86400 == 0) {
else if (secs % SECS_PER_DAY == 0) {
leap = -1;
time_state = TIME_OOP;
printk(KERN_NOTICE
......@@ -400,7 +401,7 @@ int second_overflow(unsigned long secs)
case TIME_DEL:
if (!(time_status & STA_DEL))
time_state = TIME_OK;
else if ((secs + 1) % 86400 == 0) {
else if ((secs + 1) % SECS_PER_DAY == 0) {
leap = 1;
time_state = TIME_WAIT;
printk(KERN_NOTICE
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment