Commit 924f8f5a authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra Committed by Ingo Molnar

llist: Add llist_next()

So we don't have to expose the struct list_node member.

Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1315836348.26517.41.camel@twinsSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 38aaf809
......@@ -138,6 +138,11 @@ static inline bool llist_empty(const struct llist_head *head)
return ACCESS_ONCE(head->first) == NULL;
}
static inline struct llist_node *llist_next(struct llist_node *node)
{
return node->next;
}
/**
* llist_add - add a new entry
* @new: new entry to be added
......
......@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ void irq_work_run(void)
while (llnode != NULL) {
work = llist_entry(llnode, struct irq_work, llnode);
llnode = llnode->next;
llnode = llist_next(llnode);
/*
* Clear the PENDING bit, after this point the @work
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment