Commit 925e2d1d authored by Suraj Jitindar Singh's avatar Suraj Jitindar Singh Committed by Michael Ellerman

powerpc: Update of_remove_property() call sites to remove null checking

After obtaining a property from of_find_property() and before calling
of_remove_property() most code checks to ensure that the property
returned from of_find_property() is not null. The previous patch moved
this check to the start of the function of_remove_property() in order to
avoid the case where this check isn't done and a null value is passed.
This ensures the check is always conducted before taking locks and
attempting to remove the property. Thus it is no longer necessary to
perform a check for null values before invoking of_remove_property().

Update of_remove_property() call sites in order to remove redundant
checking for null property value as check is now performed within the
of_remove_property function().
Signed-off-by: default avatarSuraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>
[mpe: Unbreak some lines which are just >80 chars for readability]
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
parent 201b3fe5
......@@ -228,17 +228,12 @@ static struct property memory_limit_prop = {
static void __init export_crashk_values(struct device_node *node)
{
struct property *prop;
/* There might be existing crash kernel properties, but we can't
* be sure what's in them, so remove them. */
prop = of_find_property(node, "linux,crashkernel-base", NULL);
if (prop)
of_remove_property(node, prop);
prop = of_find_property(node, "linux,crashkernel-size", NULL);
if (prop)
of_remove_property(node, prop);
of_remove_property(node, of_find_property(node,
"linux,crashkernel-base", NULL));
of_remove_property(node, of_find_property(node,
"linux,crashkernel-size", NULL));
if (crashk_res.start != 0) {
crashk_base = cpu_to_be_ulong(crashk_res.start),
......@@ -258,16 +253,13 @@ static void __init export_crashk_values(struct device_node *node)
static int __init kexec_setup(void)
{
struct device_node *node;
struct property *prop;
node = of_find_node_by_path("/chosen");
if (!node)
return -ENOENT;
/* remove any stale properties so ours can be found */
prop = of_find_property(node, kernel_end_prop.name, NULL);
if (prop)
of_remove_property(node, prop);
of_remove_property(node, of_find_property(node, kernel_end_prop.name, NULL));
/* information needed by userspace when using default_machine_kexec */
kernel_end = cpu_to_be_ulong(__pa(_end));
......
......@@ -403,7 +403,6 @@ static struct property htab_size_prop = {
static int __init export_htab_values(void)
{
struct device_node *node;
struct property *prop;
/* On machines with no htab htab_address is NULL */
if (!htab_address)
......@@ -414,12 +413,8 @@ static int __init export_htab_values(void)
return -ENODEV;
/* remove any stale propertys so ours can be found */
prop = of_find_property(node, htab_base_prop.name, NULL);
if (prop)
of_remove_property(node, prop);
prop = of_find_property(node, htab_size_prop.name, NULL);
if (prop)
of_remove_property(node, prop);
of_remove_property(node, of_find_property(node, htab_base_prop.name, NULL));
of_remove_property(node, of_find_property(node, htab_size_prop.name, NULL));
htab_base = cpu_to_be64(__pa(htab_address));
of_add_property(node, &htab_base_prop);
......
......@@ -191,8 +191,8 @@ static int update_dt_node(__be32 phandle, s32 scope)
break;
case 0x80000000:
prop = of_find_property(dn, prop_name, NULL);
of_remove_property(dn, prop);
of_remove_property(dn, of_find_property(dn,
prop_name, NULL));
prop = NULL;
break;
......
......@@ -303,7 +303,6 @@ static int do_remove_property(char *buf, size_t bufsize)
{
struct device_node *np;
char *tmp;
struct property *prop;
buf = parse_node(buf, bufsize, &np);
if (!np)
......@@ -316,9 +315,7 @@ static int do_remove_property(char *buf, size_t bufsize)
if (strlen(buf) == 0)
return -EINVAL;
prop = of_find_property(np, buf, NULL);
return of_remove_property(np, prop);
return of_remove_property(np, of_find_property(np, buf, NULL));
}
static int do_update_property(char *buf, size_t bufsize)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment