Commit 92853a77 authored by Thomas Gleixner's avatar Thomas Gleixner

x86/cpu: Move __max_die_per_package to common.c

In preparation of a complete replacement for the topology leaf 0xb/0x1f
evaluation, move __max_die_per_package into the common code.

Will be removed once everything is converted over.
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: default avatarJuergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: default avatarSohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Tested-by: default avatarMichael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: default avatarZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: default avatarWang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Tested-by: default avatarK Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153624.768188958@linutronix.de


parent 598e719c
......@@ -76,6 +76,9 @@ u32 elf_hwcap2 __read_mostly;
int smp_num_siblings = 1;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_num_siblings);
unsigned int __max_die_per_package __read_mostly = 1;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__max_die_per_package);
static struct ppin_info {
int feature;
int msr_ppin_ctl;
......
......@@ -25,9 +25,6 @@
#define BITS_SHIFT_NEXT_LEVEL(eax) ((eax) & 0x1f)
#define LEVEL_MAX_SIBLINGS(ebx) ((ebx) & 0xffff)
unsigned int __max_die_per_package __read_mostly = 1;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__max_die_per_package);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* Check if given CPUID extended topology "leaf" is implemented
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment