scsi: pm8001: Use non-atomic bitmap ops for tag alloc + free

In pm8001_tag_alloc() we don't require atomic set_bit() as we are already
in atomic context. In pm8001_tag_free() we should use the same host
spinlock to protect clearing the tag (and then don't require the atomic
clear_bit()).

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1654879602-33497-4-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.comTested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>

drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c

@@ -66,7 +66,11 @@ static int pm8001_find_tag(struct sas_task *task, u32 *tag)
 void pm8001_tag_free(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u32 tag)
 {
 	void *bitmap = pm8001_ha->tags;
-	clear_bit(tag, bitmap);
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&pm8001_ha->bitmap_lock, flags);
+	__clear_bit(tag, bitmap);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm8001_ha->bitmap_lock, flags);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -76,9 +80,9 @@ void pm8001_tag_free(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u32 tag)
   */
 int pm8001_tag_alloc(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u32 *tag_out)
 {
-	unsigned int tag;
 	void *bitmap = pm8001_ha->tags;
 	unsigned long flags;
+	unsigned int tag;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&pm8001_ha->bitmap_lock, flags);
 	tag = find_first_zero_bit(bitmap, pm8001_ha->tags_num);
@@ -86,7 +90,7 @@ int pm8001_tag_alloc(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u32 *tag_out)
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm8001_ha->bitmap_lock, flags);
 		return -SAS_QUEUE_FULL;
 	}
-	set_bit(tag, bitmap);
+	__set_bit(tag, bitmap);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm8001_ha->bitmap_lock, flags);
 	*tag_out = tag;
 	return 0;