Commit 94681e28 authored by David Gow's avatar David Gow Committed by Shuah Khan

kunit: executor: Fix a memory leak on failure in kunit_filter_tests

It's possible that memory allocation for 'filtered' will fail, but for the
copy of the suite to succeed. In this case, the copy could be leaked.

Properly free 'copy' in the error case for the allocation of 'filtered'
failing.

Note that there may also have been a similar issue in
kunit_filter_subsuites, before it was removed in "kunit: flatten
kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites".

This was reported by clang-analyzer via the kernel test robot, here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/c8073b8e-7b9e-0830-4177-87c12f16349c@intel.com/

And by smatch via Dan Carpenter and the kernel test robot:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202207101328.ASjx88yj-lkp@intel.com/

Fixes: a02353f4 ("kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOM")
Reported-by: default avatarkernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>
Reported-by: default avatarkernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: default avatarDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDaniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBrendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarShuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
parent f84a9e96
......@@ -74,8 +74,10 @@ kunit_filter_tests(const struct kunit_suite *const suite, const char *test_glob)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
filtered = kcalloc(n + 1, sizeof(*filtered), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!filtered)
if (!filtered) {
kfree(copy);
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
n = 0;
kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment