ext4: fix online resize with very large inode tables
commit b93c9535 upstream. If a file system has a large number of inodes per block group, all of the metadata blocks in a flex_bg may be larger than what can fit in a single block group. Unfortunately, ext4_alloc_group_tables() in resize.c was never tested to see if it would handle this case correctly, and there were a large number of bugs which caused the following sequence to result in a BUG_ON: kernel bug at fs/ext4/resize.c:409! ... call trace: [<ffffffff81256768>] ext4_flex_group_add+0x1448/0x1830 [<ffffffff81257de2>] ext4_resize_fs+0x7b2/0xe80 [<ffffffff8123ac50>] ext4_ioctl+0xbf0/0xf00 [<ffffffff811c111d>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x2dd/0x4b0 [<ffffffff811b9df2>] ? final_putname+0x22/0x50 [<ffffffff811c1371>] sys_ioctl+0x81/0xa0 [<ffffffff81676aa9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b code: c8 4c 89 df e8 41 96 f8 ff 44 89 e8 49 01 c4 44 29 6d d4 0 rip [<ffffffff81254fa1>] set_flexbg_block_bitmap+0x171/0x180 This can be reproduced with the following command sequence: mke2fs -t ext4 -i 4096 /dev/vdd 1G mount -t ext4 /dev/vdd /vdd resize2fs /dev/vdd 8G To fix this, we need to make sure the right thing happens when a block group's inode table straddles two block groups, which means the following bugs had to be fixed: 1) Not clearing the BLOCK_UNINIT flag in the second block group in ext4_alloc_group_tables --- the was proximate cause of the BUG_ON. 2) Incorrectly determining how many block groups contained contiguous free blocks in ext4_alloc_group_tables(). 3) Incorrectly setting the start of the next block range to be marked in use after a discontinuity in setup_new_flex_group_blocks(). Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment