Commit 96b5b458 authored by Dima Chumak's avatar Dima Chumak Committed by Saeed Mahameed

net/mlx5e: Offload tuple rewrite for non-CT flows

Setting connection tracking OVS flows and then setting non-CT flows that
use tuple rewrite action (e.g. mod_tp_dst), causes the latter flows not
being offloaded.

Fix by using a stricter condition in modify_header_match_supported() to
check tuple rewrite support only for flows with CT action. The check is
factored out into standalone modify_tuple_supported() function to aid
readability.

Fixes: 7e36feeb ("net/mlx5e: CT: Don't offload tuple rewrites for established tuples")
Signed-off-by: default avatarDima Chumak <dchumak@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarPaul Blakey <paulb@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
parent 7d6c86e3
......@@ -1181,7 +1181,8 @@ int mlx5_tc_ct_add_no_trk_match(struct mlx5_flow_spec *spec)
mlx5e_tc_match_to_reg_get_match(spec, CTSTATE_TO_REG,
&ctstate, &ctstate_mask);
if (ctstate_mask)
if ((ctstate & ctstate_mask) == MLX5_CT_STATE_TRK_BIT)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
ctstate_mask |= MLX5_CT_STATE_TRK_BIT;
......
......@@ -2909,6 +2909,37 @@ static int is_action_keys_supported(const struct flow_action_entry *act,
return 0;
}
static bool modify_tuple_supported(bool modify_tuple, bool ct_clear,
bool ct_flow, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
struct mlx5_flow_spec *spec)
{
if (!modify_tuple || ct_clear)
return true;
if (ct_flow) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
"can't offload tuple modification with non-clear ct()");
netdev_info(priv->netdev,
"can't offload tuple modification with non-clear ct()");
return false;
}
/* Add ct_state=-trk match so it will be offloaded for non ct flows
* (or after clear action), as otherwise, since the tuple is changed,
* we can't restore ct state
*/
if (mlx5_tc_ct_add_no_trk_match(spec)) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
"can't offload tuple modification with ct matches and no ct(clear) action");
netdev_info(priv->netdev,
"can't offload tuple modification with ct matches and no ct(clear) action");
return false;
}
return true;
}
static bool modify_header_match_supported(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
struct mlx5_flow_spec *spec,
struct flow_action *flow_action,
......@@ -2947,18 +2978,9 @@ static bool modify_header_match_supported(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
return err;
}
/* Add ct_state=-trk match so it will be offloaded for non ct flows
* (or after clear action), as otherwise, since the tuple is changed,
* we can't restore ct state
*/
if (!ct_clear && modify_tuple &&
mlx5_tc_ct_add_no_trk_match(spec)) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
"can't offload tuple modify header with ct matches");
netdev_info(priv->netdev,
"can't offload tuple modify header with ct matches");
if (!modify_tuple_supported(modify_tuple, ct_clear, ct_flow, extack,
priv, spec))
return false;
}
ip_proto = MLX5_GET(fte_match_set_lyr_2_4, headers_v, ip_protocol);
if (modify_ip_header && ip_proto != IPPROTO_TCP &&
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment