Bluetooth: SCO: Fix possible circular locking dependency sco_sock_getsockopt
This attempts to fix the following trace: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.3.0-rc2-g68fcb3a7bf97 #4706 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ sco-tester/31 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880025b8070 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sco_sock_getsockopt+0x1fc/0xa90 but task is already holding lock: ffff888001eeb130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_sock_getsockopt+0x104/0xa90 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}: lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x80 sco_connect_cfm+0x118/0x4a0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1e6/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #1 (hci_cb_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 hci_sync_conn_complete_evt+0x1ad/0x3d0 hci_event_packet+0x55c/0x7c0 hci_rx_work+0x34c/0xa00 process_one_work+0x575/0x910 worker_thread+0x89/0x6f0 kthread+0x14e/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x50 -> #0 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x18cc/0x3740 lock_acquire+0x151/0x3a0 __mutex_lock+0x13b/0xcc0 sco_sock_getsockopt+0x1fc/0xa90 __sys_getsockopt+0xe9/0x190 __x64_sys_getsockopt+0x5b/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x42/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x70/0xda other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &hdev->lock --> hci_cb_list_lock --> sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); lock(hci_cb_list_lock); lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); lock(&hdev->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by sco-tester/31: #0: ffff888001eeb130 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sco_sock_getsockopt+0x104/0xa90 Fixes: 248733e8 ("Bluetooth: Allow querying of supported offload codecs over SCO socket") Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment