Commit 9853832c authored by Linus Torvalds's avatar Linus Torvalds

Merge branch 'locks' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux

* 'locks' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux:
  pid-namespaces-vs-locks-interaction
  file locks: Use wait_event_interruptible_timeout()
  locks: clarify posix_locks_deadlock
parents b21761ff ab1f1611
......@@ -125,6 +125,7 @@
#include <linux/syscalls.h>
#include <linux/time.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
#include <asm/semaphore.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
......@@ -185,6 +186,7 @@ void locks_init_lock(struct file_lock *fl)
fl->fl_fasync = NULL;
fl->fl_owner = NULL;
fl->fl_pid = 0;
fl->fl_nspid = NULL;
fl->fl_file = NULL;
fl->fl_flags = 0;
fl->fl_type = 0;
......@@ -553,6 +555,8 @@ static void locks_insert_lock(struct file_lock **pos, struct file_lock *fl)
{
list_add(&fl->fl_link, &file_lock_list);
fl->fl_nspid = get_pid(task_tgid(current));
/* insert into file's list */
fl->fl_next = *pos;
*pos = fl;
......@@ -584,6 +588,11 @@ static void locks_delete_lock(struct file_lock **thisfl_p)
if (fl->fl_ops && fl->fl_ops->fl_remove)
fl->fl_ops->fl_remove(fl);
if (fl->fl_nspid) {
put_pid(fl->fl_nspid);
fl->fl_nspid = NULL;
}
locks_wake_up_blocks(fl);
locks_free_lock(fl);
}
......@@ -634,33 +643,6 @@ static int flock_locks_conflict(struct file_lock *caller_fl, struct file_lock *s
return (locks_conflict(caller_fl, sys_fl));
}
static int interruptible_sleep_on_locked(wait_queue_head_t *fl_wait, int timeout)
{
int result = 0;
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
__set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
add_wait_queue(fl_wait, &wait);
if (timeout == 0)
schedule();
else
result = schedule_timeout(timeout);
if (signal_pending(current))
result = -ERESTARTSYS;
remove_wait_queue(fl_wait, &wait);
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
return result;
}
static int locks_block_on_timeout(struct file_lock *blocker, struct file_lock *waiter, int time)
{
int result;
locks_insert_block(blocker, waiter);
result = interruptible_sleep_on_locked(&waiter->fl_wait, time);
__locks_delete_block(waiter);
return result;
}
void
posix_test_lock(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
{
......@@ -673,55 +655,67 @@ posix_test_lock(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
if (posix_locks_conflict(fl, cfl))
break;
}
if (cfl)
if (cfl) {
__locks_copy_lock(fl, cfl);
else
if (cfl->fl_nspid)
fl->fl_pid = pid_nr_ns(cfl->fl_nspid,
task_active_pid_ns(current));
} else
fl->fl_type = F_UNLCK;
unlock_kernel();
return;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(posix_test_lock);
/* This function tests for deadlock condition before putting a process to
* sleep. The detection scheme is no longer recursive. Recursive was neat,
* but dangerous - we risked stack corruption if the lock data was bad, or
* if the recursion was too deep for any other reason.
/*
* Deadlock detection:
*
* We attempt to detect deadlocks that are due purely to posix file
* locks.
*
* We rely on the fact that a task can only be on one lock's wait queue
* at a time. When we find blocked_task on a wait queue we can re-search
* with blocked_task equal to that queue's owner, until either blocked_task
* isn't found, or blocked_task is found on a queue owned by my_task.
* We assume that a task can be waiting for at most one lock at a time.
* So for any acquired lock, the process holding that lock may be
* waiting on at most one other lock. That lock in turns may be held by
* someone waiting for at most one other lock. Given a requested lock
* caller_fl which is about to wait for a conflicting lock block_fl, we
* follow this chain of waiters to ensure we are not about to create a
* cycle.
*
* Note: the above assumption may not be true when handling lock requests
* from a broken NFS client. But broken NFS clients have a lot more to
* worry about than proper deadlock detection anyway... --okir
* Since we do this before we ever put a process to sleep on a lock, we
* are ensured that there is never a cycle; that is what guarantees that
* the while() loop in posix_locks_deadlock() eventually completes.
*
* However, the failure of this assumption (also possible in the case of
* multiple tasks sharing the same open file table) also means there's no
* guarantee that the loop below will terminate. As a hack, we give up
* after a few iterations.
* Note: the above assumption may not be true when handling lock
* requests from a broken NFS client. It may also fail in the presence
* of tasks (such as posix threads) sharing the same open file table.
*
* To handle those cases, we just bail out after a few iterations.
*/
#define MAX_DEADLK_ITERATIONS 10
/* Find a lock that the owner of the given block_fl is blocking on. */
static struct file_lock *what_owner_is_waiting_for(struct file_lock *block_fl)
{
struct file_lock *fl;
list_for_each_entry(fl, &blocked_list, fl_link) {
if (posix_same_owner(fl, block_fl))
return fl->fl_next;
}
return NULL;
}
static int posix_locks_deadlock(struct file_lock *caller_fl,
struct file_lock *block_fl)
{
struct file_lock *fl;
int i = 0;
next_task:
if (posix_same_owner(caller_fl, block_fl))
return 1;
list_for_each_entry(fl, &blocked_list, fl_link) {
if (posix_same_owner(fl, block_fl)) {
if (i++ > MAX_DEADLK_ITERATIONS)
return 0;
fl = fl->fl_next;
block_fl = fl;
goto next_task;
}
while ((block_fl = what_owner_is_waiting_for(block_fl))) {
if (i++ > MAX_DEADLK_ITERATIONS)
return 0;
if (posix_same_owner(caller_fl, block_fl))
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
......@@ -1256,7 +1250,10 @@ int __break_lease(struct inode *inode, unsigned int mode)
if (break_time == 0)
break_time++;
}
error = locks_block_on_timeout(flock, new_fl, break_time);
locks_insert_block(flock, new_fl);
error = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(new_fl->fl_wait,
!new_fl->fl_next, break_time);
__locks_delete_block(new_fl);
if (error >= 0) {
if (error == 0)
time_out_leases(inode);
......@@ -2084,6 +2081,12 @@ static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file *f, struct file_lock *fl,
int id, char *pfx)
{
struct inode *inode = NULL;
unsigned int fl_pid;
if (fl->fl_nspid)
fl_pid = pid_nr_ns(fl->fl_nspid, task_active_pid_ns(current));
else
fl_pid = fl->fl_pid;
if (fl->fl_file != NULL)
inode = fl->fl_file->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
......@@ -2124,16 +2127,16 @@ static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file *f, struct file_lock *fl,
}
if (inode) {
#ifdef WE_CAN_BREAK_LSLK_NOW
seq_printf(f, "%d %s:%ld ", fl->fl_pid,
seq_printf(f, "%d %s:%ld ", fl_pid,
inode->i_sb->s_id, inode->i_ino);
#else
/* userspace relies on this representation of dev_t ;-( */
seq_printf(f, "%d %02x:%02x:%ld ", fl->fl_pid,
seq_printf(f, "%d %02x:%02x:%ld ", fl_pid,
MAJOR(inode->i_sb->s_dev),
MINOR(inode->i_sb->s_dev), inode->i_ino);
#endif
} else {
seq_printf(f, "%d <none>:0 ", fl->fl_pid);
seq_printf(f, "%d <none>:0 ", fl_pid);
}
if (IS_POSIX(fl)) {
if (fl->fl_end == OFFSET_MAX)
......
......@@ -872,6 +872,7 @@ struct file_lock {
struct list_head fl_block; /* circular list of blocked processes */
fl_owner_t fl_owner;
unsigned int fl_pid;
struct pid *fl_nspid;
wait_queue_head_t fl_wait;
struct file *fl_file;
unsigned char fl_flags;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment