Commit 989f77e3 authored by Douglas Anderson's avatar Douglas Anderson Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

nvmem: qfprom: Improve the comment about regulator setting

In review feedback Joe Perches found the existing comment
confusing. Let's use something based on the wording proposed by Joe.
Suggested-by: default avatarJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarStephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSrinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210611083348.20170-10-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 1f7b4d87
......@@ -196,9 +196,9 @@ static int qfprom_enable_fuse_blowing(const struct qfprom_priv *priv,
}
/*
* Hardware requires a min voltage for fuse blowing; this may be
* a rail shared do don't specify a max--regulator constraints
* will handle.
* Hardware requires a minimum voltage for fuse blowing.
* This may be a shared rail so don't specify a maximum.
* Regulator constraints will cap to the actual maximum.
*/
ret = regulator_set_voltage(priv->vcc, qfprom_blow_uV, INT_MAX);
if (ret) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment