Commit 9908859a authored by Alex Shi's avatar Alex Shi Committed by Rafael J. Wysocki

cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency consideration

There may be special requirements on CPU response time, like if a
interrupt is pinned to a CPU, that CPU should not go into excessively
deep idle states.  For this reason, add a mechanism for adding
PM QoS resume latency constraints for individual CPUs and modify the
menu governor to take them into account.

To that end, extend the device PM QoS pm_qos_resume_latency attribute
to CPUs, which is possible, because the exit latency for CPUs is
effectively equivalent to the resume latency for devices.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
Acked-by: default avatarRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
[ rjw : Subject & changelog ]
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent 8e37e1a2
......@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/tick.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/math64.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
/*
* Please note when changing the tuning values:
......@@ -280,17 +281,23 @@ static unsigned int get_typical_interval(struct menu_device *data)
static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev)
{
struct menu_device *data = this_cpu_ptr(&menu_devices);
struct device *device = get_cpu_device(dev->cpu);
int latency_req = pm_qos_request(PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY);
int i;
unsigned int interactivity_req;
unsigned int expected_interval;
unsigned long nr_iowaiters, cpu_load;
int resume_latency = dev_pm_qos_read_value(device);
if (data->needs_update) {
menu_update(drv, dev);
data->needs_update = 0;
}
/* resume_latency is 0 means no restriction */
if (resume_latency && resume_latency < latency_req)
latency_req = resume_latency;
/* Special case when user has set very strict latency requirement */
if (unlikely(latency_req == 0))
return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment