Commit 992d7ced authored by Ming Lei's avatar Ming Lei Committed by Ingo Molnar

locking: Documentation: lockdep-design.txt, fix note of state bits

From source code of get_usage_char(), the previous note is not correct,
so fix it.

static char get_usage_char(struct lock_class *class, enum lock_usage_bit bit)
{
	char c = '.';

	if (class->usage_mask & lock_flag(bit + 2))/*LOCK_ENABLED_##STATE*/
		c = '+';
	if (class->usage_mask & lock_flag(bit)) {/*LOCK_USED_IN_##STATE*/
		c = '-';
		if (class->usage_mask & lock_flag(bit + 2))
			c = '?';
	}

	return c;
}

note:

1) The 'bit' parameter always is passed as  LOCK_USED_IN_##STATE
   or LOCK_USED_IN_##STATE_READ , from get_usage_chars().
Signed-off-by: default avatarMing Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <1240585806-5744-1-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent b48ccb09
......@@ -54,9 +54,9 @@ locking error messages, inside curlies. A contrived example:
The bit position indicates STATE, STATE-read, for each of the states listed
above, and the character displayed in each indicates:
'.' acquired while irqs disabled
'+' acquired in irq context
'-' acquired with irqs enabled
'.' acquired while irqs disabled and not in irq context
'-' acquired in irq context
'+' acquired with irqs enabled
'?' acquired in irq context with irqs enabled.
Unused mutexes cannot be part of the cause of an error.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment