Commit 99bf0eeb authored by Yanfei Xu's avatar Yanfei Xu Committed by Dave Jiang

cxl/pci: Check Mem_info_valid bit for each applicable DVSEC

In theory a device might set the mem_info_valid bit for a first range
after it is ready but before as second range has reached that state.
Therefore, the correct approach is to check the Mem_info_valid bit for
each applicable DVSEC range against HDM_COUNT, rather than only for the
DVSEC range 1. Consequently, let's move the check into the "for loop"
that handles each DVSEC range.
Reviewed-by: default avatarJonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarYanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAlison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240828084231.1378789-4-yanfei.xu@intel.comSigned-off-by: default avatarDave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
parent 5c6e3d5a
......@@ -324,10 +324,6 @@ int cxl_dvsec_rr_decode(struct device *dev, struct cxl_port *port,
if (!hdm_count || hdm_count > 2)
return -EINVAL;
rc = cxl_dvsec_mem_range_valid(cxlds, 0);
if (rc)
return rc;
/*
* The current DVSEC values are moot if the memory capability is
* disabled, and they will remain moot after the HDM Decoder
......@@ -345,6 +341,10 @@ int cxl_dvsec_rr_decode(struct device *dev, struct cxl_port *port,
u64 base, size;
u32 temp;
rc = cxl_dvsec_mem_range_valid(cxlds, i);
if (rc)
return rc;
rc = pci_read_config_dword(
pdev, d + CXL_DVSEC_RANGE_SIZE_HIGH(i), &temp);
if (rc)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment