perf bpf: Remove undefined behavior from bpf_perf_object__next()
bpf_perf_object__next() folded the last element in the list test with the empty list test. However, this meant that offsets were computed against null and that a struct list_head was compared against a 'struct bpf_perf_object'. Working around this with clang's undefined behavior sanitizer required -fno-sanitize=null and -fno-sanitize=object-size. Remove the undefined behavior by using the regular Linux list APIs and handling the starting case separately from the end testing case. Looking at uses like bpf_perf_object__for_each(), as the constant NULL or non-NULL argument can be constant propagated, the code is no less efficient. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Cc: Christy Lee <christylee@fb.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726220921.2567761-1-irogers@google.comSigned-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment