Commit 9a909a14 authored by Rafael J. Wysocki's avatar Rafael J. Wysocki

cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Drop pointless label from acpi_cpufreq_target()

The "out" label at the final return statement in acpi_cpufreq_target()
is totally pointless, so drop them and modify the code to return the
right values immediately instead of jumping to it.

No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: default avatarViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
parent 6019d23a
......@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
} else {
pr_debug("Already at target state (P%d)\n",
next_perf_state);
goto out;
return 0;
}
}
......@@ -456,8 +456,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
cmd.val = (u32) perf->states[next_perf_state].control;
break;
default:
result = -ENODEV;
goto out;
return -ENODEV;
}
/* cpufreq holds the hotplug lock, so we are safe from here on */
......@@ -480,7 +479,6 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (!result)
perf->state = next_perf_state;
out:
return result;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment